Revenue Tax Briefing Issue 42 (part 2), 2000
Section 53 Finance Act 2000 introduced new Chapters 4 and 5 into Part 26 of the TCA 1997. Chapter 5 deals with the new exit-tax regime and is not covered in this article. Chapter 4 (including changes made by Finance Act 2001) brings all life assurance companies within a Case I taxing regime, but keeps domestic life business within the I-E provisions to the extent that it relates to life policies written before 31 December 2000.
Tax Briefing, Issue 41 (September 2000) gives a general overview of the old and new regimes and how they will interact with one another. This article sets out the Revenue view as to how the provisions of Chapter 4 will apply in practice as regards the format of the tax computation.
The position as set out in this article represents an amendment of the practice as outlined in Tax Briefing, Issue 24 (December 1996). The essential difference is that the article in Tax Briefing, Issue 24 was concerned with Notional Case I, which is not a real Case I liability, but rather a factor which in the I-E system determines the level of restriction, if any, of management expenses. By way of a long standing practice the Notional Case I figure was taken as the shareholders' profits figure for the purpose of calculating 'pegged rate' relief. As we are now moving on to a full Case I system, regard must be had to what is the true profit after exclusion of amounts belonging to the policyholders. In the case of IFSC companies, there was some ambiguity as to the correct methodology for calculating Case I profits following the article in Tax Briefing, Issue 24. As a matter of practice, IFSC companies were allowed to avail of a Notional Case I type calculation. However it should be noted that this practice will no longer apply post 31 December 2000.
The majority of life companies will, from 1 January 2001, have a mixture of old basis and new basis life business and the tax computation will be on the I-E regime for old basis business and on a Case I regime for new basis business. Ultimately, when the old basis business has become negligible, the new regime will be fully operational for all types of business.
Total Irish Dividend Income |
× |
Profit on Activities |
Total Technical Income |
(per non-technical a/c) |
Transfer from technical account |
X | |
Add |
Taxation |
X |
X |
||
Add |
Investment Income |
X |
Profit on Ordinary Activities |
X |
|
Add |
Transfer to fund for future appropriations |
X |
Normal add-backs |
X |
|
Less |
Normal deductions |
X |
Capital Allowance |
X |
|
Irish Dividend Income |
X |
|
Taxable profits |
X |
|
Tax payable |
X |
|
Less |
Tax deducted at source |
X |
Credits |
Double Tax Relief (net basis) |
X |
Net Tax Liability |
X |
Notes
5% of transfer |
× |
Irish Mean Liabilities |
World-Wide Mean Liabilities |
Case I - The total Case I will be calculated on the basis outlined above. However the computation will be adjusted to extract the profits attributable to the 'old basis' business. The methodology would be to attribute income and expenditure into each category to the extent that such income/expenditure is identifiable. Where income/expenditure cannot be the subject of specific attribution e.g. general expenses, capital allowances, then they will be allocated by reference to actuarial valuation. In practice each company will submit a computation with accompanying notes on specific items, as appropriate.
The following is an illustration of the position:
£millions |
Old Basis |
New Basis |
DETE Total |
Old Basis |
New Basis |
Accounts Total |
Premiums |
70 |
30 |
100 |
70 |
30 |
100 |
Investment Income |
40 |
10 |
50 |
40 |
10 |
50 |
Expenses |
(5) |
(25) |
(30) |
(5) |
(10) |
(15) |
Claims |
(20) |
(5) |
(25) |
(20) |
(5) |
(25) |
Movement in Reserves |
(65) |
(20) |
(85) |
(65) |
(20) |
(85) |
Surplus/Profit |
20 |
(10) |
10 |
20 |
5 |
25 |
DETE Transfer |
25 |
(10) |
15 |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Assume that the above example represents the position after a few years into the new regime by which time, say, shareholder tax is 12.5% and standard rate tax is 20%. The company only writes Old Basis business and New Basis business i.e. no pensions or PHI etc. The totals for DETE and for the Accounts bases are from the audited respective annual returns.
It is assumed for simplicity that the only material difference between the two bases is in the treatment of acquisition expenses, these being deferred under the Accounts basis. We also ignore any FFA complications.
The following comments are made in respect of the allocation between Old Basis and New Basis:
In deriving the tax computation we ignore second order adjustments and in particular we assume that the NCI would equal the DETE Transfer. Accordingly the tax computation would be as follows:
Old Basis: |
I - E = 35 of which 25 (NCI) is taxed at 12.5% and 10 is taxed at 20%. |
New Basis: |
5 is taxed at 12.5% (of course policyholders will have been debited with any exit taxes due). |
Tax deducted at source - This will follow the relevant attribution of investment income.
Double Taxation Relief (DTR) - Again this will follow the relevant attribution of investment income and therefore the amounts of DTR available under each system should be readily available. For new basis business DTR will be available at the CT rate only in respect of the following:
Any excess credit will be treated in accordance with the general rules applicable to DTR.
These are to be integrated into Case I going forward. The question of the allowability of pre-31 December 2000 losses arises. It is proposed to deal with these as follows:
To allow any losses forward into the new regime, where PHI previously assessed under Case I of Schedule D.
This will continue for 'old basis' life business. The existing law and practice will continue to apply and in particular the Notional Case I will be calculated by reference to the position outlined in the Tax Briefingarticle in Issue 24.
All IB business falls within “old basis” business, including business written on or after 1 January 2001.